Backlink index scope and export limits matter more than the cheapest entry amount.
THE ATN TAKE · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT
Majestic is worth evaluating for a specifically defined backlink investigation; Ahrefs bundles broader research but its Starter plan is constrained. Ahrefs’s adult-content restriction must be resolved before any intended workflow, and Majestic permission is also unverified. This comparison assigns no data-quality winner. [1][4][2][5]
MajesticBacklink research using Site Explorer and the Fresh Index; Historic Index is included in Pro. [1]
AhrefsSite and keyword research, technical site audits and rank tracking. [2]
Free entry
MajesticFree signup and tools are offered. The first-purchase Lite/Pro seven-day refund requires a support request; it is not a free trial. [1][3]
AhrefsFree account for verified sites; its help table lists 5,000 crawl credits per verified project per month. [2]
Paid entry · monthly billing
MajesticLite: US$49.99/month or US$499.99 every 12 months. Pro: US$99.99/month. Prices exclude VAT. [1]
AhrefsStarter: US$29/month in the USD help table. Monthly renewal only; Lite is listed at US$129/month. [2]
Included limits to notice
MajesticLite: one user, 5,000 Site Explorer rows per search and one million analysis units. Pro adds Historic Index and raw exports. Limits use different units from tracked keywords. [1]
AhrefsStarter: 200 monthly credits, 50 tracked keywords and no report exports. Additional users and credits cannot be purchased on Starter. [2]
Adult-business eligibility
MajesticContributions and interactive services cannot promote sexually explicit material. Permission for the intended adult-business research workflow was not established. [4]
AhrefsIts Content Policy explicitly prohibits adult content. ATN has not verified an exception for the intended workflow. [5]
Affiliate status
MajesticAn older official developer page says no traditional affiliate program and describes case-by-case OpenApps partnerships. Current public cash commission terms are unverified. [6]
AhrefsOfficial June 2023 statement says the public program was discontinued. No replacement program was verified. [7]
Decision pointATN assessment
MajesticA defined backlink investigation where index history and report allowances matter more than bundling unrelated tools. Confirm intended use first. [1][4]
AhrefsResolve the content-policy restriction first; a cheaper entry plan is not useful if the work is ineligible. [5][2]
Published entry plans have different scopes and allowances. Prices are dated snapshots; confirm currency, billing term, taxes and add-ons. Customer-use policies and affiliate-promotion rules are separate. This comparison does not establish permission for an adult-business workflow or prove research accuracy.
Majestic puts Historic Index and raw exports in Pro. Write down whether a current backlink view or historical investigation is required before comparing subscription prices. An index’s presence does not prove its completeness for a particular site. [1]
Do not compare unlike usage units
Ahrefs Starter uses monthly credits and limits tracked keywords; Majestic lists analysis units and per-search rows. Define the reports and exports you need instead of interpreting a larger numerical allowance as greater usable capacity. [2][1]
Separate evaluation from commitment
Majestic’s first-purchase refund requires an application to support. Ahrefs’s free account is scoped to verified sites. Neither removes content rules, and neither old affiliate-program statement establishes a current ATN commission. [3][1][2][5][6][7]
Research based · No hands-on testing or numeric scores · Direct links, no affiliate tracking. Our editorial standards