Compare a scoped cloud subscription with a desktop crawl and an annual per-user licence.
Screaming Frog offers a practical free starting point for a small technical crawl. Lumar describes shared issue handling and configurable analytics for a larger team workflow. The choice depends on the task, deployment model and contract, not an untested claim that one crawler is faster or more accurate. [3] [1] [5]
| THE DETAILSFind your fit. | LumarRead research review | Screaming Frog SEO SpiderView profile |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Cloud website crawling with technical SEO, speed, accessibility and custom analytics modules. Confirm the modules included in the quote. [1] [2] | A site crawler for technical SEO checks. [3] |
| Free access | Demo offered; no ongoing free plan or universal self-service trial was established. [2] | Up to 500 URLs in each free crawl; advanced features restricted. [3] |
| Paid option | Custom quote based on packaging and requirements; no universal public amount verified. [2] | £199 per user/year in the GBP price view; checkout determines any applicable tax. [4] |
| Where it runs | Cloud application accessed through a supported web browser. [5] | Desktop software for Windows, macOS and Linux. [3] |
| Setup requirement | Subscription and applicable agreement; intended contract scope must be confirmed. [5] | Download the desktop app. Free mode needs no sign-up. [3] |
| Main limitation | Public EULA restricts service-provider use and crawling obscene or unlawful URLs; a conflicting master subscription agreement prevails. Intended eligibility remains unresolved. [5] | Free mode cannot save crawls or render JavaScript. [3] |
| Affiliate or partner status | Agency and technology partnerships are advertised. Public referral-commission terms and ATN participation were not established. [6] | Official FAQ says there is no affiliate program for SEO Spider at this time. [7] |
| Consider it forATN assessment | A team needing shared issue prioritization and tasks, after agreeing on modules, crawl allowances and permitted use. These features are provider descriptions, not measured outcomes. [1] [5] | Finding technical issues across pages; use with Search Console for Google’s reports. [3] [8] |
These tools answer different questions: Google Search visibility, technical page issues, or page-load behavior. They can complement each other. This is a documented workflow comparison, not a benchmark, a security audit, guaranteed ranking gains or adult-business approval.
Free SEO Spider is limited to 500 URLs per crawl and cannot save crawls or render JavaScript. Decide which missing capability is needed before paying. Lumar’s demo can clarify workflow fit, but it is not a verified ongoing free tier. [3] [2]
SEO Spider’s GBP licence is £199 per user/year. Lumar requires a quote: specify modules, crawl volume, users and support so that a complete service cost can be compared with the desktop workflow. Do not assume every advertised Lumar module is bundled. [4] [2] [1]
Lumar’s public EULA limits service-provider use and certain crawling, while an applicable master agreement can override conflicting provisions. Its agency partnership page does not itself establish a contract exception or commission entitlement. SEO Spider’s FAQ says it has no affiliate program; neither fact decides technical suitability. [5] [6] [7]
Research based · No hands-on testing or numeric scores · Direct links, no affiliate tracking. Our editorial standards
Browse SEO resourcesFocused browser checks and automated API calls are different from crawling a website.
Read comparisonBUILD / SEO toolsThird-party checks complement first-party reports of a site’s Google Search presence.
Read comparisonBUILD / SEO toolsA page-load test and a technical site crawl produce different evidence.
Read comparisonBUILD / SEO toolsPage-performance diagnosis complements reports of Google Search visibility.
Read comparisonBUILD / SEO toolsFocused performance tests and a scoped website-analysis platform serve different workloads.
Read comparisonBUILD / SEO toolsSearch reporting and a configurable cloud crawler answer different questions.
Read comparison